| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Protection mechanism failure for some Edge Orchestrator software for Intel(R) Tiber™ Edge Platform may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| ZKsync Era is a layer 2 rollup that uses zero-knowledge proofs to scale Ethereum. Prior to version 1.3.10, there is a very specific pattern `f(a(),b()); check_if_a_executed_last()` in Yul that exposes a bug in evaluation order of Yul function arguments. This vulnerability has been fixed in version 1.3.10. As a workaround, update and redeploy affected contracts.
|
| A "Privilege boundary violation" vulnerability is identified affecting multiple Radiometer Products. Exploitation of this vulnerability gives a user with physical access to the analyzer, the possibility to gain unauthorized access to functionalities outside the restricted environment. The vulnerability is due to weakness in the design of access control implementation in application software.
Other related CVE's are CVE-2025-14096 & CVE-2025-14097.
Affected customers have been informed about this vulnerability. This CVE is being published to provide transparency.
Required configuration for Exposure:
Physical access to the analyzer is needed.
Temporary work Around:
Only authorized people can physically access the analyzer.
Permanent solution:
Local Radiometer representatives will contact all affected customers to discuss a permanent solution.
Exploit Status:
Researchers have provided working proof-of-concept. Radiometer is not aware of any publicly available exploit at the time of publication. Note:
CVSS score 6.8 when underlying OS is Windows 7 or Windows XP Operating systems and CVSS score 5.7 when underlying OS is Windows 8 or Windows 10 operating systems. |
| A vulnerability has been found in Union Bank of India Vyom 8.0.34 on Android and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Rooting Detection. The manipulation leads to protection mechanism failure. The attack needs to be approached locally. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| Anthropic Sandbox Runtime is a lightweight sandboxing tool for enforcing filesystem and network restrictions on arbitrary processes at the OS level, without requiring a container. Prior to 0.0.16, due to a bug in sandboxing logic, sandbox-runtime did not properly enforce a network sandbox if the sandbox policy did not configure any allowed domains. This could allow sandboxed code to make network requests outside of the sandbox. A patch for this was released in v0.0.16. |
| Protection mechanism failure of bus lock regulator for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via network access. |
| Insufficient control flow management in UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to enable denial of service via local access. |
| The configuration pages available are not intended to be placed on an Internet facing web server, as they expose file paths to the client, who can be an attacker. Instead of rewriting these pages to avoid this vulnerability, they will be dismissed from future releases of Cegid Meta4 HR, as they do not offer product functionality |
| Insufficient control flow management in some Intel(R) QAT Engine for OpenSSL software before version v1.6.1 may allow information disclosure via network access. |
| The ejs (aka Embedded JavaScript templates) package before 3.1.10 for Node.js lacks certain pollution protection. |
| In CARLA through 0.9.15.2, the collision sensor mishandles some situations involving pedestrians or bicycles, in part because the collision sensor function is not exposed to the Blueprint library. |
| Protection mechanism failure in the SPP for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| Certain motherboard models developed by GIGABYTE has a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. Because IOMMU was not properly enabled, unauthenticated physical attackers can use a DMA-capable PCIe device to read and write arbitrary physical memory before the OS kernel and its security features are loaded. |
| Certain motherboard models developed by MSI has a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. Because IOMMU was not properly enabled, unauthenticated physical attackers can use a DMA-capable PCIe device to read and write arbitrary physical memory before the OS kernel and its security features are loaded. |
| Certain motherboard models developed by ASRock and its subsidiaries, ASRockRack and ASRockInd. has a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. Because IOMMU was not properly enabled, unauthenticated physical attackers can use a DMA-capable PCIe device to read and write arbitrary physical memory before the OS kernel and its security features are loaded. |
| Insufficient control flow management in the Alias Checking Trusted Module for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 processor E-Cores firmware may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| Incorrect behavior order for some Intel(R) Core™ Ultra Processors may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via physical access. |
| Insufficient control flow management for some Edge Orchestrator software for Intel(R) Tiber™ Edge Platform may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via adjacent access. |
| Insufficient control flow management in the Alias Checking Trusted Module (ACTM) firmware for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| Insufficient control flow management for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi Software for Windows before version 23.160 within Ring 2: Device Drivers may allow a denial of service. Unprivileged software adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via adjacent access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) impacts. |
