Export limit exceeded: 419555 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (16294 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-5594 | 1 Pagekit | 1 Pagekit | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Pagekit CMS before 1.0.11. In this vulnerability the remote attacker is able to reset the registered user's password, when the debug toolbar is enabled. The password is successfully recovered using this exploit. The SecureLayer7 ID is SL7_PGKT_01. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5614 | 1 Cpanel | 1 Cpanel | 2025-04-20 | 6.1 Medium |
| Open redirect vulnerability in cgiemail and cgiecho allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via vectors involving the (1) success or (2) failure parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5615 | 1 Cpanel | 2 Cgiecho, Cgiemail | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| cgiemail and cgiecho allow remote attackers to inject HTTP headers via a newline character in the redirect location. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5634 | 1 Norwegian-air | 1 Norwegian Air Kiosk | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Norwegian Air Shuttle (aka norwegian.com) airline kiosk allows physically proximate attackers to bypass the intended "Please select booking identification" UI step, and obtain administrative privileges and network access on the underlying Windows OS, by accessing a touch-screen print icon to manipulate the print dialog. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5661 | 1 Apache | 1 Formatting Objects Processor | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache FOP before 2.2, files lying on the filesystem of the server which uses FOP can be revealed to arbitrary users who send maliciously formed SVG files. The file types that can be shown depend on the user context in which the exploitable application is running. If the user is root a full compromise of the server - including confidential or sensitive files - would be possible. XXE can also be used to attack the availability of the server via denial of service as the references within a xml document can trivially trigger an amplification attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5662 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 5 Batik, Jboss Amq, Jboss Bpms and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Batik before 1.9, files lying on the filesystem of the server which uses batik can be revealed to arbitrary users who send maliciously formed SVG files. The file types that can be shown depend on the user context in which the exploitable application is running. If the user is root a full compromise of the server - including confidential or sensitive files - would be possible. XXE can also be used to attack the availability of the server via denial of service as the references within a xml document can trivially trigger an amplification attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6872 | 1 Siemens | 4 Ozw672, Ozw672 Firmware, Ozw772 and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability was discovered in Siemens OZW672 (all versions) and OZW772 (all versions) that could allow an attacker with access to port 21/tcp to access or alter historical measurement data stored on the device. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6895 | 1 Usb Pratirodh Project | 1 Usb Pratirodh | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| USB Pratirodh allows remote attackers to conduct XML External Entity (XXE) attacks via XML data in usb.xml. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7233 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Openstack, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 relies on user input in some cases to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security check for these redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) considered some numeric URLs "safe" when they shouldn't be, aka an open redirect vulnerability. Also, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could suffer from an XSS attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7234 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A maliciously crafted URL to a Django (1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18) site using the ``django.views.static.serve()`` view could redirect to any other domain, aka an open redirect vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7266 | 1 Netflix | 1 Security Monkey | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Netflix Security Monkey before 0.8.0 has an Open Redirect. The logout functionality accepted the "next" parameter which then redirects to any domain irrespective of the Host header. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7308 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 4 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Mrg and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| The packet_set_ring function in net/packet/af_packet.c in the Linux kernel through 4.10.6 does not properly validate certain block-size data, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (integer signedness error and out-of-bounds write), or gain privileges (if the CAP_NET_RAW capability is held), via crafted system calls. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7343 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiportal | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An open redirect vulnerability in Fortinet FortiPortal 4.0.0 and below allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via the url parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8372 | 1 Underbit | 1 Mad Libmad | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The mad_layer_III function in layer3.c in Underbit MAD libmad 0.15.1b, if NDEBUG is omitted, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and application exit) via a crafted audio file. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8385 | 1 Craftcms | 1 Craft Cms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Craft CMS before 2.6.2976 does not prevent modification of the URL in a forgot-password email message. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8418 | 1 Rubocop Project | 1 Rubocop | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| RuboCop 0.48.1 and earlier does not use /tmp in safe way, allowing local users to exploit this to tamper with cache files belonging to other users. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8451 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| With X-Pack installed, Kibana versions before 5.3.1 have an open redirect vulnerability on the login page that would enable an attacker to craft a link that redirects to an arbitrary website. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8535 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Endpoint Protection, Exchange Server, Forefront Endpoint Protection and 10 more | 2025-04-20 | 5.5 Medium |
| The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8536, CVE-2017-8537, CVE-2017-8539, and CVE-2017-8542. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8536 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Endpoint Protection, Exchange Server, Forefront Endpoint Protection and 10 more | 2025-04-20 | 5.5 Medium |
| The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8535, CVE-2017-8537, CVE-2017-8539, and CVE-2017-8542. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8537 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Endpoint Protection, Exchange Server, Forefront Endpoint Protection and 10 more | 2025-04-20 | 5.5 Medium |
| The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8535, CVE-2017-8536, CVE-2017-8539, and CVE-2017-8542. | ||||