Export limit exceeded: 11008 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11008 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-8202 | 1 Broadcom | 1 Fabric Operating System | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected versions, non-root users can gain root access with a combination of shell commands and parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8216 | 1 Dell | 1 Emc Data Domain Os | 2025-04-20 | 6.7 Medium |
| EMC Data Domain OS (DD OS) 5.4 all versions, EMC Data Domain OS (DD OS) 5.5 family all versions prior to 5.5.5.0, EMC Data Domain OS (DD OS) 5.6 family all versions prior to 5.6.2.0, EMC Data Domain OS (DD OS) 5.7 family all versions prior to 5.7.2.10 has a command injection vulnerability that could potentially be exploited by malicious users to compromise the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8219 | 1 Cloudfoundry | 2 Capi-release, Cf-release | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to 250 and CAPI-release versions prior to 1.12.0. A user with the SpaceAuditor role is over-privileged with the ability to restage applications. This could cause application downtime if the restage fails. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3321 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Fingerprint Manager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Services and files in Lenovo Fingerprint Manager before 8.01.42 have incorrect ACLs, which allows local users to invalidate local checks and gain privileges via standard filesystem operations. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3617 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimanager Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Fortinet FortiManager 5.0 before 5.0.11 and 5.2 before 5.2.2 allow local users to gain privileges via crafted CLI commands. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3643 | 2 Canonical, Usb-creator Project | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Usb-creator | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| usb-creator before 0.2.38.3ubuntu0.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, before 0.2.56.3ubuntu0.1 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, before 0.2.62ubuntu0.3 on Ubuntu 14.10, and before 0.2.67ubuntu0.1 on Ubuntu 15.04 allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging a missing call check_polkit for the KVMTest method. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4889 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Servicedesk Plus | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| ZOHO ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus before 9.0 allows remote authenticated guest users to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to restrict access to unknown functions. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4973 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Cf, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to v257; UAA release 2.x versions prior to v2.7.4.14, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.8, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.10, and other versions prior to v3.15.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.12, 24.x versions prior to v24.7, and other versions prior to v30. A vulnerability has been identified with the groups endpoint in UAA allowing users to elevate their privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6339 | 1 Trendmicro | 1 Interscan Web Security Virtual Appliance | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Trend Micro InterScan Web Security Virtual Appliance (IWSVA) 6.5 before CP 1746 mismanages certain key and certificate data. Per IWSVA documentation, by default, IWSVA acts as a private Certificate Authority (CA) and dynamically generates digital certificates that are sent to client browsers to complete a secure passage for HTTPS connections. It also allows administrators to upload their own certificates signed by a root CA. An attacker with low privileges can download the current CA certificate and Private Key (either the default ones or ones uploaded by administrators) and use those to decrypt HTTPS traffic, thus compromising confidentiality. Also, the default Private Key on this appliance is encrypted with a very weak passphrase. If an appliance uses the default Certificate and Private Key provided by Trend Micro, an attacker can simply download these and decrypt the Private Key using the default/weak passphrase. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6342 | 1 Dahuasecurity | 4 Camera Firmware, Dhi-hcvr7216a-s3, Nvr Firmware and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered on Dahua DHI-HCVR7216A-S3 devices with NVR Firmware 3.210.0001.10 2016-06-06, Camera Firmware 2.400.0000.28.R 2016-03-29, and SmartPSS Software 1.16.1 2017-01-19. When SmartPSS Software is launched, while on the login screen, the software in the background automatically logs in as admin. This allows sniffing sensitive information identified in CVE-2017-6341 without prior knowledge of the password. This is a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-6117. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6401 | 1 Veritas | 2 Netbackup, Netbackup Appliance | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Veritas NetBackup before 8.0 and NetBackup Appliance before 3.0. Local arbitrary command execution can occur when using bpcd and bpnbat. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8032 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Cf, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Cloud Foundry cf-release versions prior to v264; UAA release all versions of UAA v2.x.x, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.13, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.15, 3.20.x versions prior to v3.20.0, and other versions prior to v4.4.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.17, 24.x versions prior to v24.12. 30.x versions prior to 30.5, and other versions prior to v41, zone administrators are allowed to escalate their privileges when mapping permissions for an external provider. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7925 | 1 Dahuasecurity | 30 Ddh-hcvr4xxx, Dh-hcvr4xxx Firmware, Dh-hcvr5xxx and 27 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A Password in Configuration File issue was discovered in Dahua DH-IPC-HDBW23A0RN-ZS, DH-IPC-HDBW13A0SN, DH-IPC-HDW1XXX, DH-IPC-HDW2XXX, DH-IPC-HDW4XXX, DH-IPC-HFW1XXX, DH-IPC-HFW2XXX, DH-IPC-HFW4XXX, DH-SD6CXX, DH-NVR1XXX, DH-HCVR4XXX, DH-HCVR5XXX, DHI-HCVR51A04HE-S3, DHI-HCVR51A08HE-S3, and DHI-HCVR58A32S-S2 devices. The password in configuration file vulnerability was identified, which could lead to a malicious user assuming the identity of a privileged user and gaining access to sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7923 | 1 Hikvision | 116 Ds-2cd2032-i, Ds-2cd2032-i Firmware, Ds-2cd2112-i and 113 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A Password in Configuration File issue was discovered in Hikvision DS-2CD2xx2F-I Series V5.2.0 build 140721 to V5.4.0 build 160530, DS-2CD2xx0F-I Series V5.2.0 build 140721 to V5.4.0 Build 160401, DS-2CD2xx2FWD Series V5.3.1 build 150410 to V5.4.4 Build 161125, DS-2CD4x2xFWD Series V5.2.0 build 140721 to V5.4.0 Build 160414, DS-2CD4xx5 Series V5.2.0 build 140721 to V5.4.0 Build 160421, DS-2DFx Series V5.2.0 build 140805 to V5.4.5 Build 160928, and DS-2CD63xx Series V5.0.9 build 140305 to V5.3.5 Build 160106 devices. The password in configuration file vulnerability could allow a malicious user to escalate privileges or assume the identity of another user and access sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6507 | 2 Apparmor, Canonical | 3 Apparmor, Ubuntu Core, Ubuntu Touch | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in AppArmor before 2.12. Incorrect handling of unknown AppArmor profiles in AppArmor init scripts, upstart jobs, and/or systemd unit files allows an attacker to possibly have increased attack surfaces of processes that were intended to be confined by AppArmor. This is due to the common logic to handle 'restart' operations removing AppArmor profiles that aren't found in the typical filesystem locations, such as /etc/apparmor.d/. Userspace projects that manage their own AppArmor profiles in atypical directories, such as what's done by LXD and Docker, are affected by this flaw in the AppArmor init script logic. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6620 | 1 Cisco | 2 Small Business Rv Series Router, Small Business Rv Series Router Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the remote management access control list (ACL) feature of the Cisco CVR100W Wireless-N VPN Router could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the remote management ACL. The vulnerability is due to incorrect implementation of the ACL decision made during the ingress connection request to the remote management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a connection to the management IP address or domain name of the targeted device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the configured remote management ACL. This can occur when the Remote Management configuration parameter is set to Disabled. This vulnerability affects Cisco CVR100W Wireless-N VPN Routers running a firmware image prior to 1.0.1.24. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc14457. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7922 | 1 Cambium Networks | 8 Epmp 1000, Epmp 1000 Firmware, Epmp 1000 Hotspot and 5 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An Improper Privilege Management issue was discovered in Cambium Networks ePMP. The privileges for SNMP community strings are not properly restricted, which may allow an attacker to gain access to sensitive information and possibly allow for configuration changes. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7918 | 1 Cambium Networks | 8 Epmp 1000, Epmp 1000 Firmware, Epmp 1000 Hotspot and 5 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An Improper Access Control issue was discovered in Cambium Networks ePMP. After a valid user has used SNMP configuration export, an attacker is able to remotely trigger device configuration backups using specific MIBs. These backups lack proper access control and may allow access to sensitive information and possibly allow for configuration changes. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4896 | 1 Setucocms Project | 1 Setucocms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| SetsucoCMS all versions does not properly manage sessions, which allows remote attackers to disclose or alter unauthorized information via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5007 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 3 Spring Framework, Spring Framework, Spring Security | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Both Spring Security 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.0 and the Spring Framework 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x, 4.2.x rely on URL pattern mappings for authorization and for mapping requests to controllers respectively. Differences in the strictness of the pattern matching mechanisms, for example with regards to space trimming in path segments, can lead Spring Security to not recognize certain paths as not protected that are in fact mapped to Spring MVC controllers that should be protected. The problem is compounded by the fact that the Spring Framework provides richer features with regards to pattern matching as well as by the fact that pattern matching in each Spring Security and the Spring Framework can easily be customized creating additional differences. | ||||