Export limit exceeded: 24622 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24622 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-18156 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security controls by forging user identities due to improper authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18154 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 8 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the use of a hard-coded or predictable cryptographic key. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18153 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and forge authentication tags due to the use of hard-coded cryptographic keys and initialization vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18152 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 7.4 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to forge validly-signed messages due to improper verification of cryptographic signatures. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11788 | 1 Redhat | 12 389 Directory Server, Directory Server, Directory Server E4s and 9 more | 2026-10-08 | 5.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The dereference control plugin does not check for allocation failure before using a BER structure, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the LDAP server when the system is under memory pressure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11770 | 2 Port389, Redhat | 13 389-ds-base, 389 Directory Server, Directory Server and 10 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. An unauthenticated remote attacker can inject LDAP search filters into the CleanAllRUV replication status-check extended operation. Because the handler performs the search against cn=config with elevated replication plugin privileges and returns a boolean match result, the attacker can extract sensitive server configuration metadata, including replication bind DNs and password storage scheme information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76560 | 1 Redhat | 10 Directory Server, Directory Server E4s, Enterprise Linux and 7 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The SELFDN ACI bind-rule evaluator incorrectly matches an anonymous LDAP client's empty bind DN against an empty stored attribute value, allowing an unauthenticated client to satisfy access control checks intended to require a matching authenticated identity. This can allow an anonymous LDAP client to perform an operation, such as adding or modifying a directory entry, that a SELFDN-based ACI intended to restrict to a specific authenticated user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18922 | 1 Redhat | 11 Directory Server, Directory Server E4s, Enterprise Linux and 8 more | 2026-10-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. During SASL PLAIN authentication, a stale identity carried in a Cyrus SASL auxiliary property from a prior failed bind attempt can be installed on a connection following a subsequent, unrelated successful bind, regardless of which SASL mechanism completes that second bind. An attacker can send a SASL PLAIN bind as cn=Directory Manager with an incorrect password, then complete a SASL ANONYMOUS bind on the same connection, causing the server to grant Directory Manager authority without any valid credentials. A variant using a valid low-privileged account's own successful bind instead of an anonymous one is also possible. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19843 | 1 Redhat | 6 Directory Server, Directory Server E2s, Directory Server E4s and 3 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.4 High |
| A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. The Cockpit 389 Console's LDAP editor constructs an ldapsearch command by embedding an LDAP entry's distinguished name (DN) into a shell command string without proper escaping. An LDAP user with delegated privileges to create or rename directory entries could craft a malicious DN containing shell metacharacters. When a Cockpit administrator subsequently views the entry in the 389 Console, the embedded shell command executes with root privileges on the directory server host. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18453 | 1 Redhat | 11 Directory Server, Directory Server E4s, Enterprise Linux and 8 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A missing NULL pointer check in the paged results handling of op_shared_search allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the LDAP server by sending a crafted sequence of search requests using the USE_ONE_BACKEND control, resulting in denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18355 | 1 Redhat | 10 Directory Server, Directory Server E4s, Enterprise Linux and 7 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in the SASL I/O layer of 389 Directory Server (389-ds-base). In sasl_io_start_packet(), the wrapped-record length read from the wire is validated only against an upper bound. A small wire length (0, 1, or 2) produces an encrypted_buffer_count below the already-consumed encrypted_buffer_offset, causing an unsigned subtraction underflow in sasl_io_read_packet(). PR_Recv is then requested to read approximately 4 GiB into a 1024-byte heap buffer, resulting in a heap buffer overflow with attacker-controlled content. After a successful SASL bind with integrity protection (SSF > 0), a remote authenticated attacker can cause a denial of service or potentially achieve remote code execution. This flaw is distinct from CVE-2026-11774, whose fix only guards against upper-bound overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15722 | 1 Redhat | 12 389 Directory Server, Directory Server, Directory Server E4s and 9 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A stack buffer overflow flaw was found in 389 Directory Server (389-ds-base). The get_ruvelement_from_berval() function in repl5_ruv.c copies digit characters from a network-supplied RUV berval into a fixed 16-byte stack buffer without bounds checking. A remote unauthenticated attacker can crash the LDAP server by sending a crafted StartNSDS50ReplicationRequest extended operation containing a replica ID field with more than 16 digit characters. The overflow occurs during payload decoding, before any authorization check. Stack protectors limit impact to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17635 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 9.1 Critical |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to improper configuration of HTTP method-based security constraints. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17636 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 4 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager (ftm) for Redhat Openshift, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of a specified quantity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17637 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 4 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager (ftm) for Redhat Openshift, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow an adjacent-network attacker to execute arbitrary code due to deserialization of untrusted data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17643 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 4 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager (ftm) for Redhat Openshift, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information and perform unauthorized actions due to insufficiently protected credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17644 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 4 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager (ftm) for Redhat Openshift, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information and modify transaction data due to the use of hard-coded credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17645 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 9.1 Critical |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper privilege management. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12423 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 5 Enterprise Linux, Satellite, Satellite Capsule and 2 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Foreman. The Red Hat Satellite /unattended/provision API endpoint is vulnerable to an authentication bypass due to a semantic logic flaw in host_verifier.rb. The application verifies the database state of a provisioning token rather than its actual presence in the incoming HTTP request. Because a host actively undergoing provisioning has an unexpired token in the database, the server's valid_host_token? method evaluates to true, granting access to the kickstart template even if the requester provides no token at all in the URL. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12541 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 5 Enterprise Linux, Satellite, Satellite Capsule and 2 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.2 High |
| A flaw was found in Foreman. OS command injection vulnerabilities exist in the foreman-rake db:dump and db:import_dump tasks. The application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input in the destination parameter (during backups) and the file parameter (during imports) before passing them to a Ruby system() call for execution. An attacker with permissions to execute foreman-rake (e.g., via a restricted sudo configuration) can append malicious shell commands to the provided file paths. | ||||