Export limit exceeded: 416456 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 416456 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 416456 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (416456 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-99122 | 1 Linux | 2 Linux, Linux Kernel | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vsock/vmci: validate packet source for connected sockets vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb() looks up sockets first by the full source and destination tuple, then by destination only in the bound table. The fallback can select a non-listening socket without checking whether the packet came from its stored peer. This was reproduced with two VMCI contexts. A RST from the context not stored in a TCP_SYN_SENT socket reset that socket after it was selected by the destination-only lookup. VMCI can process notification packets in bottom-half context when the socket is not owned by user context, or defer packets to a workqueue. Use vsock_check_source() after taking the socket lock in the bottom-half path, and recheck after lock_sock() in the workqueue path. Listening sockets continue to accept packets from any source. Reply with a RST addressed from the received packet before dropping a source that fails validation. This preserves the existing reset behavior for bound non-listening and concurrently closed sockets without directing the reset to a connected socket's stored peer. | ||||
| CVE-2026-99125 | 1 Linux | 2 Linux, Linux Kernel | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s390/pai: Handle multiple PMU stop callback invocations Handle the following scenario: The kernel protects itself against a very high sampling load and throttles the sampling using: perf_event_throttle() --> PMU->stop() Shortly later the scheduler may terminate the task and removes it from the CPU. It again calls PMU->stop() which results in two invocations of PMU->stop() called back to back. Protect against this and check the PERF_HES_STOPPED bit on function entry. If it is already set return. Clear bit PERF_HES_STOPPED in PMU->start(). Prohibit ioctl(fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD, ...) call for this event. It sets perf_event::event_limit to a positive value and causes perf_event_overflow() to invoke pai_stop() call back function when perf_event::event_limit hits zero. This is not supported because the sample events CRYPTO_ALL and NNPA_ALL are only taken at schedule out of a task. Use list_for_each_entry_safe() for safe iteration over syswide_list in pai_have_samples(). | ||||
| CVE-2026-99104 | 1 Linux | 2 Linux, Linux Kernel | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched_ext: Fix the bypass dispatch claim for schedulers bypassed by an ancestor scx_bypass() claims bypass dispatch when the scheduler's depth goes from zero to one and releases it when the depth returns to zero, but propagates only the depth to the descendants, not the claim. A descendant that starts bypassing with its ancestor never claims, and one whose own bypass ends under the ancestor's keeps its claim, as its depth does not return to zero. A sub-scheduler enable whose bypass ends under a PM suspend thus leaks its claim: the parent keeps hosting bypass dispatch and the sub-scheduler's next bypass trips the WARN_ON_ONCE() on the claim. A sub-scheduler disable that starts under a PM suspend has no claim, so once the resume lifts the root's bypass its tasks sit on the parent's bypass DSQs with nobody consuming them. Claim for every descendant whose depth goes from zero to one in the propagation and release every scheduler in the subtree whose depth returned to zero once the tasks have moved out of the bypass DSQs. A parent that is bypassing itself when a descendant claims consumes only its own bypass DSQs, empty until it leaves bypass and becomes the host. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86383 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-10-28 | 6.8 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87097 | 1 Acronis | 1 Acronis Cyber Protect 17 | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| Sensitive information disclosure due to insufficiently protected credentials. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (Linux, Windows) before build 42587. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87101 | 1 Acronis | 1 Acronis Cyber Protect 17 | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| Sensitive information disclosure due to improper token validation. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (Linux, Windows) before build 42587. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87879 | 1 Acronis | 1 Acronis Cyber Protect 17 | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| Sensitive information disclosure due to improper token validation. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (Linux, Windows) before build 42587. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103799 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain Management Center | 2026-10-28 | 9.6 Critical |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain Management Center, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain a Missing Authorization vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized system operation on managed systems. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101273 | 1 Pretix | 1 Pretix | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| Some of our API endpoints allowed to create order payments referencing a gift card by using the auto-incremented internal ID. This ID was not checked and allowed creating payments that reference gift cards from different organizers and thereby obtaining their secret. The gift card is not charged in this case, but by then triggering a refund on the payment, one can increase the value of the gift card. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110540 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain Management Center | 2026-10-28 | 7.1 High |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain Management Center, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain a Missing Authorization vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized operation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101274 | 1 Pretix | 1 Pretix | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| When pretix is used as the identity provider in a Single-Sign-On (SSO) setup for customer accounts, the system did not properly validate the `response_type` requested in an authorization request against the configured grant type of the SSO client. This means that if an SSO client was configured to only allow the `code` response type, which requires knowledge of the client secret to use and would wrongfully send a response type like `id_token`, it would receive back a valid token. Exploiting this requires the attacker to run JavaScript on the page specified by `redirect_uri`, which must be from a list specified in the client configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101272 | 1 Pretix | 1 Pretix | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| The mechanism binding files generated during a shredding process to the authentication method is not working correctly and the same session token is used for all token-based API users. This is similar to an issue fixed in 2026.7.1 but was missed while creating the fix. Since the files are referred to by randomly generated UUIDs and only exist for a day, there is virtually no risk, but it renders the added protection mechanism useless. As part of the fix, we have also improved hardening of some other related code areas. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5009 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-10-28 | 8.2 High |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions starting from 13.12 before 16.2.7, all versions starting from 16.3 before 16.3.4. It was possible for an attacker to run pipeline jobs as an arbitrary user via scheduled security scan policies. This was a bypass of [CVE-2023-3932](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-3932) showing additional impact. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3932 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-10-28 | 8.2 High |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions starting from 13.12 before 16.0.8, all versions starting from 16.1 before 16.1.3, all versions starting from 16.2 before 16.2.2. It was possible for an attacker to run pipeline jobs as an arbitrary user via scheduled security scan policies. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118485 | 1 Axel Download Accelerator | 1 Axel | 2026-10-28 | 8.1 High |
| Axel Download Accelerator 2.17.14 and earlier performs URL percent-decoding (http_decode()) on the output filename after the URL has been parsed and the filename component extracted. This allows an attacker to embed %2e%2e%2f (URL-encoded ../) sequences in the URL path. These sequences survive the URL parser intact (they contain no literal / characters) but are decoded into directory traversal sequences before the output file is opened for writing. As a result, a crafted URL can cause axel to write downloaded content to arbitrary filesystem paths relative to the current working directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25439 | 2 Fs-code, Wordpress | 2 Booknetic, Wordpress | 2026-10-28 | 8.1 High |
| Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in Booknetic Booknetic booknetic allows Authentication Abuse.This issue affects Booknetic: from n/a before 5.10.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39746 | 2026-10-28 | 9.3 Critical | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Booknetic Booknetic booknetic allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Booknetic: from n/a before 5.10.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116855 | 2026-10-28 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in wphocus My auctions allegro my-auctions-allegro-free-edition allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects My auctions allegro: from n/a through 4.0.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90719 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain Management Center | 2026-10-28 | 2.7 Low |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain Management Center, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118477 | 1 Eisge | 1 Kalifast | 2026-10-28 | 9.8 Critical |
| The ei_git_repo_url parameter in the Git remote configuration endpoint of KaliFast is vulnerable to OS Command Injection. This OS Command Injection vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker (free registration available) to execute arbitrary commands on the KaliFast server with www-data privileges. Fixed in version 2026061802. | ||||